This has to be intentional, the weakening of America.
The Commander in Chief takes an oath upon assuming the office of the President:
He is violating, apparently deliberately, the Oath of Office. What is the remedy?
Team Obama schemes for further weakening of U.S. defensive shield
What are we to make of President Obama’s attitude toward U.S. missile defenses? His past positions, his actions as president to date and the secret negotiations his administration has under way with Russia bespeak an alarming, ideologically driven hostility to the idea of protecting the American people and their allies from missile-delivered threats.
Given the irrationality of such an attitude in light of the intensifying dangers such threats represent, the Obama attitude might best be described as “anti-missilephobia.” Will Congress accommodate or counteract this potentially suicidal disorder?
The problem predates Mr. Obama’s election in 2008. He campaigned on a platform that conformed to the left’s historic hostility toward missile defenses. Candidate Obama promised not to deploy anti-missile systems that are “less than fully effective.” That is code for opposing just about any defense since critics invariably contend that some real or imagined threat could not be countered with 100 percent confidence. This ignores the deterring effect of uncertainty that even-less-than-perfect anti-missile technologies introduce in the minds of attackers, especially if differing technologies are used in a layered and synergistic approach.
With a leaning media to appease and socialize those in the circles of power (backing BO and others of his ilk) feel they have complete control over what the US will and will not do - regardless of the Constitution, Courts (which they also control) and the American People need or want. As for their voter base most are those of the entitled classes found in major urban areas. In the past it has always been understood to win the Presidency one need only win 22 (sometimes 21) states for the Electoral College vote.
ReplyDeleteIn the case of this current administration they rely on their voter support completely from the urban areas within 21 states and playing over and over the race card whenever and wherever possible.
As Lincoln admonished the Nation - a house divided cannot stand. Those who cash-up-front support BO and the Socialist movement do not want the Constitution to stand but rather the UN to take over (same as saying China).
The advanced takeover of the US by media/music/TV/movies/video games, etc. has one common goal to destroy the family values - the Ten Commandments and leave in their place - chaos - where the extreme wealthy and powerful will rule. Orwell's 1984 - realized with different names and places.
One must remember President Clinton decommissioned the 3rd largest military in the world while selling classified information on the open market to China/Russia.
Something to think upon with GB annoucing it's about to auction off one (1) carrier and three (3) destroyers - there's only one likely bidder and buyer - China. Thus their goal of two plus carriers will be well underway.
Too many are just turning their collective backs - saying it won't happen here or have any meaningful effect on their personal lives. Going to the Mall - a six-pack watching TV - or going to the various sporting events will not be interupted.
Keep your ammo dry and a good look out - there's an enemy out there and as Pogo said, "We found the enemy and it is us!"
Agree with above. Actually made it here, not bad for an elderly grunt that fits in pretty well in the 19th Century. Now you have dragged me into the 21st.
ReplyDelete